CCA by Battery Group: Typical Cold Cranking Amps for H4–H9, L1–L6, JIS and BCI

Cold cranking amps scale with battery size, because a bigger case holds more plate surface area — and plate surface is what delivers cranking current. The table below gives typical CCA by group, but the number is a range, not a fixed value: within any one group it varies by technology, plate design and test standard.

Direct answer: CCA rises with group size — an H9 has more than an H4, a JIS N200 more than a JIS N150, a BCI 8D more than a Group 31. But the group only bounds a typical range. The precise figure depends on the test standard (a JIS number reads higher than an EN number for the same battery — see What is CCA) and the design (AGM vs flooded, thin vs thick plates).

Typical CCA by group

Group / family Typical capacity Typical CCA Standard (basis)
H4 (L1)~55–60 Ah~500–600 AEN / DIN
H5 (L2)~60 Ah~600 AEN / DIN
H6 (L3)~70 Ah~640–700 AEN / DIN
H7 (L4)~80 Ah~760 AEN / DIN
H8 (L5)~90–95 Ah~850–900 AEN / DIN
H9 (L6)~105 Ah~950 AEN / DIN
JIS 55D23~60 Ah~540 AJIS (−15°C)
JIS N150 (145G51)~135 Ah~900 AJIS (−15°C)
JIS N200 (190H52)~200 Ah~1100 AJIS (−15°C)
BCI Group 31~100 Ah~900 ASAE / BCI
BCI Group 8D~200+ Ah~1400+ ASAE / BCI

Figures are typical ranges cross-checked across multiple manufacturer datasheets; they are not a substitute for the exact value on a specific battery, which can differ by ±10–15% within a group.

Why CCA scales with group size

Cranking current comes from plate surface area: more surface in contact with the electrolyte means more current can leave the cell at once. A larger group case physically holds more (or larger) plates, so its CCA ceiling rises. That is why the relationship is monotonic but loose — two batteries in the same group can differ by a hundred CCA or more if one uses thinner plates (more surface, higher CCA) and the other thicker plates (more durability, lower CCA).

The two reasons the same group prints different CCA

  1. Standard — a JIS (−15°C) number reads higher than an EN/SAE (−18°C) number for the same physical battery. Compare only within one standard.
  2. Design — AGM and EFB typically deliver higher CCA than a flooded battery of the same group, because their construction reduces internal resistance.

How to use the table

Use the group first to match the vehicle's tray and terminal layout, then use CCA to match the engine's cold-start demand and your climate. The owner's manual or the original battery label is the authority on the exact figure — the table is a starting point for recognizing whether a quoted number is in the right ballpark.

Key takeaways

  • CCA rises with group size because a larger case holds more plate surface area.
  • The group bounds a typical range, not a fixed number — values vary by ±10–15% within a group.
  • Two variables move the number within a group: the test standard and the design (AGM/EFB vs flooded).
  • Match the group to the tray first, then the CCA to the engine and climate.

The Author's Take

Position: A "typical CCA by group" table is a sanity check, not a specification — and the useful skill is reading it as a range that two variables (standard and design) can push in opposite directions.

Reasoning: The table tells you an H7 "should" be around 760 CCA, which immediately flags a quote of "H7 — 900 CCA" as either an AGM/EFB design or a JIS-warmed number. That one comparison — expected range versus quoted figure, then asking which standard produced it — catches most specification mistakes before they become a wrong purchase.

This is the author's editorial view, not a purchasing guarantee.

Sources

CCA ranges cross-verified from manufacturer datasheets (Varta, Bosch, Yuasa, Century, Exide and Chinese manufacturers including Dingwei/Chengguang) and the BCI group-size reference. Where manufacturers differ, the range is stated rather than a single figure.

  • Battery Council International (BCI) — group-size definitions.
  • EN 50342, JIS D5301, SAE J537 — cranking-amp test methods.
  • Manufacturer datasheets — H4–H9, JIS N150/N200, BCI 31/8D typical CCA values.

Last reviewed: 2026-09-14